Among all the baffling developments in Campaign 2016, perhaps the one that draws the biggest eye-rolls is Donald Trump’s support among evangelical voters.

The real estate tycoon emerged on the New York scene in the 1970s as a rich playboy who hung out in the discos where sex and drugs were everywhere. He’s famously engaged in affairs, been married three times and previously supported all forms of abortion. And he’s proven that his limited knowledge of the Bible is one of the weak spots in his shtick on the stump.

Yet, he outpolls Ted Cruz (the senator/preacher) with this group of devout Christians. What’s next in this crazy campaign, “Libertarians for Bernie Sanders?”

The National Journal took a look at this bizarre phenomenon and found many ministers in the Bible Belt are just as befuddled by this development as the most secular of political pundits.

The piece in NJ shows that many of the most religious voters in the electorate like Trump’s tough guy rhetoric. They may have been taught to love all of God’s children, but they love it when Trump says he will “bomb the sh– out of ISIS.”  They preach monogamy yet they look the other way when it’s reported that Trump years ago boasted to one commentator: “I get more p—- than you.”

One religious leader noted that a segment of the evangelical community has let their disgust with the political status quo override their social values:

“Their frus­tra­tion has out­paced their dis­cern­ment. I think it has to do with the depth of think­ing about polit­ic­al is­sues, which some­times is lack­ing when you’re frus­trated.”

Another minister explained that evangelicals are divided into segments and Trump appeals to those who want a candidate to fight for them, not necessarily one who stands by their side:

“Don­ald Trump speaks in ab­so­lutes, and most evan­gel­ic­als, we be­lieve in ab­so­lutes.”

Yet, even those who believe in religious orthodoxy can get caught up in the heated hyperbole of a Trump stump speech. A third preacher added this:

“Those voters seem to be in­ter­ested in style, as op­posed to spe­cif­ics.”