At the National Journal, Beth Reinhard may have the most
interesting take of all about the sudden Jeb Bush turnaround on immigration,
which she calls a “colossal political miscalculation.”
interesting take of all about the sudden Jeb Bush turnaround on immigration,
which she calls a “colossal political miscalculation.”
This may be all about timing and the nature of book
writing.
writing.
Reinhard reports that “when Bush and co-author Clint
Bolick were writing the book during the 2012 presidential campaign, the GOP was
veering far to the right. Republican nominee Mitt Romney had staked out a hardline
position against illegal immigration, blasting his primary rivals as
pro-amnesty and promoting ‘self-deportation’ for undocumented workers. Bush
sent the book to the printer before Christmas – weeks before a handful of
Senate Republicans embraced a sweeping overhaul that, like the proposals backed
by Bush’s brother, former President George W. Bush, would allow illegal
immigrants to earn citizenship.”
Bolick were writing the book during the 2012 presidential campaign, the GOP was
veering far to the right. Republican nominee Mitt Romney had staked out a hardline
position against illegal immigration, blasting his primary rivals as
pro-amnesty and promoting ‘self-deportation’ for undocumented workers. Bush
sent the book to the printer before Christmas – weeks before a handful of
Senate Republicans embraced a sweeping overhaul that, like the proposals backed
by Bush’s brother, former President George W. Bush, would allow illegal
immigrants to earn citizenship.”
In other words, Bush’s political party moved a lot faster
than the book-publishing world.
than the book-publishing world.
“He sent the book to the printer at a time when he was
anticipating the direction of the debate tilting against citizenship. It is
clearly contrary to what he has said before,” Marshall Fitz, director of
immigration policy at the liberal Center for American Progress told Reinhard.
“In hindsight, Americans have always judged severely efforts to deny
citizenship to classes of people. Is this really the GOP’s path out of the
political wilderness?”
anticipating the direction of the debate tilting against citizenship. It is
clearly contrary to what he has said before,” Marshall Fitz, director of
immigration policy at the liberal Center for American Progress told Reinhard.
“In hindsight, Americans have always judged severely efforts to deny
citizenship to classes of people. Is this really the GOP’s path out of the
political wilderness?”
Bush may have made things worse for himself this morning
on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” when he started backpedaling. “If you can
craft that in law, where you can have a path to citizenship where there isn’t
an incentive for people to come illegally, I’m for it,” he said.
on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” when he started backpedaling. “If you can
craft that in law, where you can have a path to citizenship where there isn’t
an incentive for people to come illegally, I’m for it,” he said.
